The Test Bench
Where market ideas get tested.
Markets are full of rules and claims. The Test Bench turns them into questions you can
measure.
We write the question, the rules and the comparison first, run the test on past data, and
publish the result either way.
Some studies test trading rules. Others look at market behaviour, risk, costs or how a
strategy actually behaves. The right comparison depends on the question — sometimes
Buy & Hold, sometimes something else.
What every Test Bench study includes
- A clear question. What exactly are we trying to find out, stated before the test is run.
- A stated method. The data, timeframe, definitions, assumptions and method are shown so the test can be understood and challenged.
- A relevant comparison. Results are measured against a baseline appropriate to the question.
- The wider evidence. Show the broader set of results rather than selecting only favourable examples.
- Risk, costs and exposure where relevant. Use the measures that matter to the question rather than assuming return is always sufficient.
- Limitations. State what the historical test can and cannot establish.
- A conclusion that matches the evidence. Some results are clear, some mixed, and some leave the question open.
Studies
Study 002 compared MACD crossovers with every trading day. A reader asked if that was fair, so we re-ran the test only against days with similar trend and volatility, with a calendar-block bootstrap interval on each crossover-minus-comparison difference.
Strategies & Signals · Market Regimes · Study 003
Read the study →
15,698 bullish MACD signal-line crossovers across 197 US large-cap stocks, 2018 to 2026, measured over the following 35 trading days against the same measurement taken from every trading day in those stocks.
Strategies & Signals · MACD · Study 002
Read the study →
Three classic breakout rules tested across 179 US stocks, with Buy & Hold comparisons, fees, drawdowns, ADX and different market conditions.
Strategies & Signals · Trend Following · Study 001
Read the study →
Start with the summary
Each study opens with a short summary of the question and what we found. The full research
follows with the method, tables, assumptions and limitations.
If the study uses a concept covered in GU Analyser’s
learning library, we link to the relevant lesson.
Explore the tools
GU Analyser is where many of these tests are built and explored, and the same tools are
open to you. Examine indicators, construct rules, compare results and test market ideas
against historical data — with the drawdown, the time invested and the fees shown
alongside the return — rather than taking a claim on trust.
Create a free account and explore the tools → Explore the learning library → These are historical analyses, not advice or forecasts. They describe
what happened on past data under stated, simplified assumptions. Past results do not prove
what will happen next, and nothing in the Test Bench is a recommendation to buy or sell an
investment. GU Analyser is an analytical and educational tool — no money is ever
traded here.